Federal Health & Welfare Updates

Oct 10, 2024

Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal of ERISA Claims over Drug Rebates

On September 25, 2024, in Knudsen v. MetLife Group Inc., the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (Third Circuit) affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action lawsuit claiming ERISA violations by defendant MetLife for its retention of prescription drug plan rebates.

Oct 10, 2024

Tax-Advantaged Wellness Indemnity Arrangements Require Careful Review

Certain pre-tax wellness arrangements that promise large tax savings for employers and employees with little employer investment (sometimes referred to as “wellness indemnity plans” or “FICA savings programs”) frequently lack a legitimate basis in tax law (the Internal Revenue Code (IRC)) and consequently are typically too good to be true. 

Oct 10, 2024

Fifth Circuit: Insurer’s Denial of Eating Disorder Benefits Violates ERISA

On September 19, 2024, in Dwyer v. United Healthcare Ins. Co., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (the court) found that defendant United Healthcare (UHC) improperly denied benefits for the continuing treatment of a participant’s anorexia nervosa, disregarding both the plan’s own coverage terms and its claims and appeals procedures.

Sep 25, 2024

HHS Cybersecurity Newsletter Explains HIPAA Facility Access Control Requirements

HHS's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has recently released its latest cybersecurity newsletter to remind HIPAA-covered entities, which include employer-sponsored health plans, and business associates (collectively, “regulated entities”), that physical security measures such as facility access controls are essential for HIPAA Security Rule compliance. These measures help prevent unauthorized access to electronic protected health information (ePHI) as the incidences of cyberattacks and breaches of ePHI are increasing.

Sep 25, 2024

Court: Denial of Wilderness Therapy Benefits Not Compliant with ERISA

On September 12, 2024, in Amy G. v. United Healthcare, the US District Court of Utah (the court) ruled that the denial of wilderness therapy benefits by defendants United Healthcare and United Behavioral Health (UBH) was arbitrary and capricious because UBH failed to provide a sufficient explanation and analysis for the denial, as required by ERISA. The court remanded the claim back to the defendants for reevaluation and redetermination.

Sep 11, 2024

Sixth Circuit: Slayer Rule Applies to ERISA Life Plans

On August 19, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Sixth Circuit) held that the federal common law prevented the named beneficiary of ERISA group life insurance from benefiting from his murder of the insured and a co-beneficiary.

1345678910Last

PPI Benefit Solutions does not provide legal or tax advice. Compliance, regulatory and related content is for general informational purposes and is not guaranteed to be accurate or complete. You should consult an attorney or tax professional regarding the application or potential implications of laws, regulations or policies to your specific circumstances.

Never miss an issue.

Sign up to have it delivered straight to your inbox.

Sign up